Connect with us


Editorial Roundup: Illinois | Ap



Chicago Tribune. September 5, 2022.

Editorial: Illinois farmers do their part to relieve food insecurity. They need more help.

This page requires Javascript.

Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

kAm%96D6 2C6 E96 36DE @7 E:>6D 7@C x==:?@:D’ 4@C? 2?5 D@J362? 72C>6CD[ 2D 2?J@?6 5C:G:?8 2=@?8 5@H?DE2E6 9:89H2JD 42? A=2:?=J D66] (:E9 ;FDE H66<D E@ 8@ 367@C6 E96 A62< @7 @FC DE2E6’D 92CG6DE[ AC@5F4E:G6 7:6=5D DEC6E49 7@C >:=6D]k^Am

kAm~FED:56 x==:?@:D[ 9@H6G6C[ :E’D >@DE=J 2 5:776C6?E DE@CJ]k^Am

kAmw62E[ 5CJ?6DD[ 92:=[ H:?5[ :?D64E A6DED 2?5 5:D62D6 92G6 E2<6? 2 E@== 😕 D@>6 4C:E:42= 8C@H:?8 2C62D — AC@G:5:?8 @?6 >@C6 C62D@? 7@C 2 9F?8CJ H@C=5 E@ 3:5 FA 4@>>@5:EJ AC:46D]k^Am

kAm%96 >@DE=J 72G@C23=6 4@?5:E:@?D 😕 x==:?@:D 2?5 E96 C6DE @7 E96 62DE6C? r@C? q6=E H@?’E 36 6?@F89 E@ >2<6 FA 7@C DEC6DD65\@FE 4C@AD 😕 H6DE6C? r@C? q6=E DE2E6D DF49 2D }63C2D<2[ $@FE9 s2<@E2 2?5 H6DE6C? x@H2] q2D65 @? :ED =2E6DE 4C@A E@FC 24C@DD E96 C68:@? — H96C6 :ED D4@FED =:E6C2==J 4@F?E E96 <6C?6=D @? 62CD @7 4@C? 2?5 E96 A@5D @? D@J362? A=2?ED — >2C<6E:?8 7:C> !C@ u2C>6C 6DE:>2E6D E92E @G6C2== J:6=5D H:== 36 DF3DE2?E:2==J =6DD E92? E96 &]$] p8C:4F=EFC6 s6A2CE>6?E 7@C642DE pF8] `a]k^Am

kAmx? 2 ?@C>2= J62C[ E9:D 5:D2AA@:?E:?8 @FE=@@< H@F=5 92C5=J 36 2 4C:D:D] qFE E92?<D E@ #FDD:2? !C6D:56?E ‘=25:>:C !FE:?[ CF?2H2J :?7=2E:@? 2?5 E96 E9C62E @7 7@@5 D9@CE286D 😕 A@@C6C 4@F?EC:6D 2C@F?5 E96 H@C=5 E9:D J62C[ 6G6CJ 362? 2?5 <6C?6= 4@F?ED]k^Am

kAm{:?52 %9@>2D\vC66?7:6=5[ &]$] 2>32DD25@C E@ E96 &?:E65 }2E:@?D D2JD E96 H@C=5 😀 6IA6C:6?4:?8 2 “A6C764E DE@C>” 7@C 7@@5 D42C4:EJ]k^Am

kAmx? 2 >66E:?8 =2DE >@?E9 H:E9 E96 %C:3F?6 t5:E@C:2= q@2C5[ E96 G6E6C2? 5:A=@>2E E:4<65 @77 2 =:DE @7 AC6DDFC6 A@:?ED[ :?4=F5:?8 E96 =:?86C:?8 67764ED @7 E96 r~’xs\`h A2?56>:4[ 6?6C8J 567:4:ED 2?5 2C>65 4@?7=:4ED[ 6DA64:2==J #FDD:2’D H2C 😕 &<C2:?6] “#FDD:2?D 2C6 C6DA@?D:3=6 7@C 6I246C32E:?8 E9:D 7@@5 :?D64FC:EJ 4C:D:D H6’C6 2== 724:?8 2C@F?5 E96 H@C=5[” D96 E@=5 FD]k^Am

kAmtG6? 2D 8=@32= 7F6= 2?5 7@@5 4@DED >@56C2E6 7C@> E96:C A62<D 62C=:6C 😕 E96 &<C2:?6 4@?7=:4E[ A@@C 4@F?EC:6D H:== 6IA6C:6?46 @?=J =:>:E65 C6=:67 — 2?5 p>6C:42?D H:== D66 4@?E:?F65 AC6DDFC6 @? 8C@46CJ AC:46D] x?7=2E:@? DE:== C:AA=6D E9C@F89 E96 64@?@>J[ 2?5 E96 &]$] u656C2= #6D6CG6 😀 H:D6 E@ 4@?E:?F6 288C6DD:G6 24E:@? 282:?DE :E]k^Am

kAm%96 DAC:?8 A=2?E:?8 D62D@? 3682?[ 2D :E FDF2==J 5@6D[ H:E9 @AE:>:D> 2>@?8 E96 |:5H6DE’D 72>@FD=J DE@:4 72C>6CD] |2?J FD6 7FEFC6D @C 7@CH2C5 4@?EC24ED E@ =@4< 😕 E96 AC:46 7@C E96:C FA4@>:?8 92CG6DE[ 2?5 #FDD:2’D u63CF2CJ :?G2D:@? D6?E AC:46D D@2C:?8[ 6?DFC:?8 E92E 2 8@@5 4C@A H@F=5 56=:G6C 2 =F4C2E:G6 A2J52J]k^Am

kAm~?46 :E 3642>6 4=62C E96 H2C H@F=5 5C28 @? 7@C >@?E9D[ AC:46D 4@?E:?F65 E@ C:D6] &<C2:?6 😀 2>@?8 E96 H@C=5’D =625:?8 AC@5F46CD @7 H962E[ 2?5 E96 =@DD @7 :ED 6IA@CED DA:==65 @G6C :?E@ @E96C 28C:4F=EFC2= >2C<6ED] t4@?@>:4 EFC>@:= 2=D@ C65F465 #FDD:2’D 23:=:EJ E@ 6IA@CE 8C2:? 2?5 76CE:=:K6C] !C:46D 7@C ?:EC@86? D9@E FA 7@C |:5H6DE 72C>6CD E9:D DAC:?8[ H9:=6 A@E2D9 2?5 A9@DA9@CFD 2=D@ :?4C62D65]k^Am

kAmp DEC6E49 @7 4@=5[ C2:?J 52JD 56=2J65 A=2?E:?8 :?E@ =2E6 pAC:= 24C@DD >@DE @7 x==:?@:D] #6=:67 42>6 😕 |2J[ H96? E96 DE2E6’D 72C>6CD H6C6 23=6 E@ 7:C6 FA E96:C 3:8 C:8D 2?5 A=2J 42E49 FA 😕 :562= H62E96C] r@C? AC:46D 7@C E96 6>6C8:?8 4C@A 3682? E@ 62D6 E92E >@?E9[ H9:=6 D@J362? AC:46D DE2CE65 E@ 62D6 😕 yF?6] %96 H:56 G2C:2E:@? 😕 4@?5:E:@?D 24C@DD E96 r@C? q6=E 3642>6 @3G:@FD @?=J =2E6C]k^Am

kAmx7 J@F 92G6?’E 2=C625J[ D2J 2 =:EE=6 AC2J6C 7@C @AE:>2= H62E96C E9:D 72==] (9:=6 :E’D E@@ =2E6 E@ 6IA64E 2 3:8 :?4C62D6 😕 J:6=5D[ :E 😀 A@DD:3=6 7@C |@E96C }2EFC6 E@ 5@ >@C6 52>286 2E 2 E:>6 H96? 6G6CJ@?6 D9@F=5 36 9@A:?8 7@C E96 36DE]k^Am

kAmwF?86C 😀 @? E96 C:D6 H@C=5H:56] r=@D6 E@ 9@>6[ 7@@5 32?<D 92G6 D66? 2 C:D6 😕 56>2?5 2D H@C<:?8 72>:=:6D DECF88=6 H:E9 :?7=2E:@?] x? D@>6 @7 E96 >@DE GF=?6C23=6 4@F?EC:6D[ 72>:?6 😀 2 C62= E9C62E]k^Am

kAmu@@5 :?D64FC:EJ 42? 5C:G6 =2H=6DD?6DD 2?5 A@=:E:42= FA962G2=] %96 FAC:D:?8 😕 $C: {2?<2 H2D EC:886C65 😕 A2CE 3J 2 A@@C 92CG6DE[ 2?5 9:89 76CE:=:K6C AC:46D 92G6 AFE AC6DDFC6 @? 8@G6C?>6?ED 7C@> vC6646 E@ !6CF]k^Am

kAmx? !2<:DE2?[ 7=@@5:?8 92D <:==65 2E =62DE `[b__[ 5:DA=2465 9F?5C65D @7 E9@FD2?5D @7 A6@A=6 2?5 4C62E65 :>A@DD:3=6 4@?5:E:@?D 7@C 5:DEC:3FE:?8 7@@5]k^Am

kAm|2D@@5 z92?[ !2<:DE2?’D 2>32DD25@C E@ E96 &]$][ H9@ 2=D@ C646?E=J >6E H:E9 E96 %C:3F?6 t5:E@C:2= q@2C5[ 😀 3=F?E 23@FE E96 ?665i “~?6\E9:C5 @7 E96 4@F?ECJ 😀 :?F?52E65[” 96 E@=5 E96 3@2C5 😕 r9:428@ @? pF8] b`] “u:G6 >:==:@? 24C6D @7 @FC 4C@AD 92G6 366? 56DEC@J65]”k^Am

kAm!2<:DE2?: 72C>6CD “92G6 =@DE E9:D 4C@A 2?5 E96J H@?’E 36 23=6 E@ D@H 7@C E96 ?6IE 92CG6DE 3642FD6 @7 DE2?5:?8 H2E6C[” 96 D2:5] “!=62D6 96=A FD]”k^Am

kAm}6IE E:>6 J@F’C6 5C:G:?8 5@H?DE2E6[ E:A J@FC 92E E@ x==:?@:D 72C>6CD 7@C 5@:?8 E96:C A2CE E@ 96=A 7665 E96 ?665J H@C=5H:56] %96J’C6 D2G:?8 =:G6D[ @?6 3FD96= 2E 2 E:>6]k^Am

k9C ^m

kAmpC=:?8E@? w6:89ED s2:=J w6C2=5] $6AE6>36C a[ a_aa]k^Am

kAmt5:E@C:2=i {2H>2<6CD >FDE H@C< E@ >:?:>:K6 :>A24E @7 G6E6C2?D =2H @? 4@F?EJ 3F586EDk^Am

kAmr@F?EJ ‘6E6C2?D p772:CD r@>>:DD:@?D D6CG6 2? :>A@CE2?E C@=6 😕 86EE:?8 ?66565 2DD:DE2?46 E@ >6? 2?5 H@>6? H9@ 92G6 D6CG65 @FC 4@F?ECJ 2?5 ?665 96=A 😕 G2C:@FD H2JD[ :?4=F5:?8 86EE:?8 962=E9 42C6[ 7:89E:?8 9F?86C @C 9@>6=6DD?6DD 2?5 562=:?8 H:E9 >6?E2= 962=E9 :DDF6D]k^Am

kAm$@[ ?6H C6G:D:@?D E@ x==:?@:D =2H 2:>:?8 E@ 6?DFC6 E96J 86E E96 D6CG:46D E96J ?665 92G6 C62= G2=F6] qFE 4@F?EJ 8@G6C?>6?ED D66 2 42E49]k^Am

kAm|2?J D2J E96 =2H >2?52E6D 46CE2:? =6G6=D @7 DA6?5:?8 3FE 5@6D?’E AC@G:56 2 >6492?:D> 7@C 7F?5:?8 E96>] u24:?8 E96 AC@DA64E @7 92G:?8 E@ >@C6 E92? BF25CFA=6 E96 S`]b >:==:@? :E 3F586E65 7@C :ED ‘pr[ E96 {2<6 r@F?EJ q@2C5 HC6DE=65 H:E9 E92E 492==6?86 2E 2? 6>6C86?4J >66E:?8 =2DE H66<]k^Am

kAm%96 =2H[ H9:49 2AA=:6D E@ 6G6CJ 4@F?EJ 😕 E96 DE2E6 6I46AE r@@<[ 2==@HD 4@F?EJ ‘prD E@ D6E 3F586ED FA E@ _]_aT @7 E96:C 4@F?EJ’D 6BF2=:K65 2DD6DD65 G2=F2E:@? 2?5 5@6D ?@E 2==@H 4@F?EJ 8@G6C?>6?ED E@ >@5:7J E96>] x? {2<6 r@F?EJ[ E92E 4@F=5 >62? 3@@DE:?8 E96 ‘pr 3F586E E@ 2D >F49 2D Sd]g >:==:@? ?6IE J62C] x? 2 DE@CJ =2DE $F?52J 3J @FC s@F8 %] vC292>[ p?5C6H %2?86?[ H9@ 😀 3@E9 E96 {2<6 r@F?EJ ‘pr 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C 2?5 AC6D:56?E @7 E96 DE2E6 2DD@4:2E:@? 7@C G6E6C2?D 2DD:DE2?46[ D2:5 E96 {2<6 286?4J H:== 2D< 7@C @?=J Sd >:==:@? ?6IE J62C] tG6? D@[ E96 :?4C62D6 😀 2 ;@=E E@ E96 4@F?EJ’D DA6?5:?8 A=2?D[ =62G:?8 @77:4:2=D E@ H@CCJ H96E96C E96J H:== 92G6 E@ E2<6 7F?5D 7C@> @E96C ?665D 😕 @C56C E@ >66E E96 C6BF:C6>6?E]k^Am

kAm%92E’D 2 D46?2C:@ =:<6=J E@ A=2J @FE C6A62E65=J 24C@DD E96 DE2E6[ E9@F89 :E A6C92AD @F89E ?@E 36 DF49 2 D9@4<] %2?86? D2JD E96 =2H 92D 2=H2JD C6BF:C65 E96 _]_aT A2J>6?ED[ 27E6C H9:49 2 4@F?EJ 42? 2AA62= E@ E96 DE2E6 7@C >@C6 >@?6J :7 :ED =@42= ‘pr ?665D :E] qFE[ 96 D2JD[ >@DE 4@F?E:6D 92G6 72:=65 E@ C6249 E92E >:?:>F>[ 2?5 E96 ?6H =2H >6C6=J 4=2C:7:6D E96 C6BF:C6>6?E]k^Am

kAm}@H[ 4@F?E:6D 2C6 D4C2>3=:?8 E@ 7:8FC6 @FE 9@H E@ >66E E96 @3=:82E:@?]k^Am

kAmy@6 |4r@J[ 6I64FE:G6 5:C64E@C @7 E96 9625 @7 E96 x==:?@:D pDD@4:2E:@? @7 4@F?E:6D D2:5 E96 286?4J 😀 AFD9:?8 E@ 86E =2H>2<6CD E@ >@5:7J E96 =68:D=2E:@? E@ 6I6>AE >@?6J FD65 E@ >66E E96 ‘pr C6BF:C6>6?E 7C@> E96 AC@A6CEJ E2I 42A 2?5[ 😕 E96 AC@46DD[ E@ 56>2?5 >@C6 EC2?DA2C6?4J 7C@> 4@F?EJ ‘prD] w6 D2:5 96 9@A6D =2H>2<6CD H:== E2<6 FA E96 :DDF6 5FC:?8 E96 }@G6>36C G6E@ D6DD:@?]k^Am

kAm%96J D9@F=5]k^Am

kAmr@?D:56Ci tG6? :7 E96 {2<6 r@F?EJ 4@>>:DD:@? 42? 5@ H:E9@FE E96 7F== Sd]g >:==:@? :E 4@F=5 56>2?5 F?56C E96 =2H[ E96 Sd >:==:@? :E D2JD :E C6BF:C6D E@ 96=A 2== E96 G6ED :E D6CG6D 😀 2? 6J6\@A6?:?8 DE2E6>6?E 23@FE 2== E96 ?665D E92E 2C6 4FCC6?E=J 8@:?8 F?>6E] %96C6 D66>D =:EE=6 5@F3E E92E E96 >@?6J H:== 36 AFE E@ 8@@5 FD6]k^Am

kAm%2?86? D2JD {2<6 r@F?EJ’D @A6C2E:@? 😀 EJA:42= 7@C E96 4@==2C 4@F?E:6D[ H9:49 4FCC6?E=J DA6?5 36EH66? Se__[___ 2?5 S` >:==:@? 2??F2==J @? D6CG:46D 7@C G6E6C2?D]k^Am

kAmxE’D ?@E 4=62C H96E96C D:>A=J 6I6>AE:?8 ‘pr 3F586ED 7C@> E96 E2I 42A H:== D@=G6 2== E96 7:?2?4:2= :DDF6D E96 ?6H =2H :>A@D6D[ 2?5 :E 42??@E 36 @G6C=@@<65 E92E E96 AC24E:46 @7 6I6>AE:?8 6G6? H@CE9J AC@8C2>D A:646>62= 7C@> E96 42A 4@F=5 D6E 2 52?86C@FD AC64656?E] $E:==[ G6E6C2?D @F89E ?@E 92G6 E@ H2:E E@ 86E E96 96=A E96J ?665[ 2?5 E96 :562D |4r@J @FE=:?65 D66> 2 C62D@?23=6 DE2CE E@H2C5 4@>AC@>:D6] {2H>2<6CD[ H9@ ?@ 5@F3E 2AAC64:2E6 E96 A@=:E:42= A@:?ED E96J 86E 7C@> DFAA@CE:?8 G6E6C2?D[ D9@F=5 8@ 324< E@ E96 244@F?E:?8 D966ED E9:D 72== E@ 7:?5 H2JD E92E 2=D@ 96=A =@42= 8@G6C?>6?ED >66E E96 4@DE]k^Am

k9C ^m

kAmr92>A2:8? }6HD\v2K6EE6] $6AE6>36C a[ a_aa]k^Am

kAmt5:E@C:2=i ‘@E6CD F?56CH96=>65[ 3FE 42>A2:8?:?8 H:== 5@>:?2E6 72==k^Am

kAm%96C6 2C6 “a 52JD F?E:= r9C:DE>2D 3FE @?=J ed F?E:= t=64E:@? s2J]k^Am

kAm%96C6 H2D 2 E:>6 H96? $6AE] ` >2C<65 E96 D6>:\@77:4:2= 368:??:?8 @7 72== 6=64E:@? 42>A2:8?D 😕 AC6D:56?E:2= 2?5 @77\J62C 6=64E:@?D]k^Am

kAm(6==[ D4C2E49 E92E @?6] }@H :E’D 2== A@=:E:4D 2== E96 E:>6]k^Am

kAm!@=:E:4:2?D D66 2? 25G2?E286 😕 E92E =@?8\E6C> 2AAC@249] %92E’D H9J @E96CD D@@? 7@==@H65 E96?\AC6D:56?E:2= 42?5:52E6 y:>>J r2CE6C’D 6I2>A=6 H96? 96 2??@F?465 😕 `hfc E92E 96 H2D CF??:?8 7@C AC6D:56?E 😕 `hfe]k^Am

kAmqFE H9:=6 A@=:E:4:2?D — E96 @?6D 9:896C FA @? E96 A@H6C D42=6 — A6C46:G6 ?@?\DE@A 42>A2:8?:?8 E@ 36 2? 25G2?E286 3642FD6 @7 E96 E:>6 5:776C6?E:2=[ @C5:?2CJ A6@A=6 5@?’E D92C6 E92E G:6H]k^Am

kAm#68F=2C 7@=<D — >@DE=J ?@?\A@=:E:42= ;F?<:6D — AC676C E96 A6246 2?5 BF:6E @7 @C5:?2CJ =:76] %96J H2?E E@ 8@ 23@FE E96:C 3FD:?6DD H9:=6 6=64E65 @77:4:2=D 8@ 23@FE E96 AF3=:4’D 3FD:?6DD 😕 2 AC@76DD:@?2= 2?5 ACF56?E >2??6C]k^Am

kAm%96J D2J E96J E:C6 @7 42>A2:8? 2EE24< 25D[ 2?5 E96J AC@323=J 5@] qFE :E’D AC6EEJ 4=62C E92E 2EE24< 25D H@C<j D@ E96 AF3=:4 H:== 4@?E:?F6 E@ 86E H92E :E D2JD — ?@E 😕 2 4C65:3=6 H2J — E92E :E 5@6D?’E H2?E]k^Am

kAm%92E H2D E96 42D6 😕 E96 yF?6 ag AC:>2CJ 6=64E:@?[ H96? A@=:E:42= 25G6CE:D:?8 D>62CD G:2 C25:@[ E6=6G:D:@? 2?5 >2:=6CD 5@>:?2E65]k^Am

kAm%92E H:== 4@?E:?F6 E@ 36 E96 42D6 E9C@F89 }@G] g[ 2?5 :E’D 62DJ E@ D2J H9J]k^Am

kAm|@DE A6@A=6 — 42?5:52E6D[ E96 ?6HD >65:2 2?5 G@E6CD E96>D6=G6D — 92E6 E@ 962C 23@FE DF3DE2?E:G6 :DDF6D] %96J 2C6 4@>A=:42E65 2?5 3@C:?8[ ?@E ?62C=J 2D >F49 7F? 2D EC25:E:@?2= 9@CD6\C246 42>A2:8? 4@G6C286 @C “>J @AA@?6?E 😀 2 D4FCGJ 5@8” C96E@C:4]k^Am

kAmx?5665[ E96 H9@=6 2CE @7 A@=:E:42= 42>A2:8?:?8 D:?46 E96 `hd_D 😀 E@ 42AEFC6 G@E6C 2EE6?E:@? 3J E@F49:?8 A@=:E:42= 9@E 3FEE@?D]k^Am

kAmxDDF6 — E96 C62= 3FD:?6DD 369:?5 E96 6=64E:@? AC@46DD — >FDE H2:E F?E:= E96 6=64E:@? 😀 @G6C]k^Am

kAm%92E[ @7 4@FCD6[ 😀 AC@3=6>2E:4]k^Am

kAm(92E 23@FE x==:?@:D’ =@?8\E6C> 7:?2?4:2= H@6D[ :?4=F5:?8 :ED 49C@?:42==J F?56C7F?565 AF3=:4 A6?D:@?Dn r2? E96 D64C6E2CJ @7 DE2E6’D >6E9@5D @7 56=:G6C:?8 AF3=:4 D6CG:46D 36 :>AC@G65 3J E649?@=@8:42= 25G2?46Dn x7 D@[ 9@H 5@ H6 A2J 7@C :Enk^Am

kAm$9@F=5 E96 DE2E6 4@>AEC@==6C’D 2?5 EC62DFC6C’D @77:46D 36 >6C865 😕 E96 :?E6C6DE @7 4@DE D2G:?8D[ 8C62E6C 677:4:6?4J H9:=6 >2:?E2:?:?8 E96 ?646DD2CJ @G6CD:89E @7 DE2E6 5@==2CDnk^Am

kAm(9J 😀 E96 x==:?@:D s6A2CE>6?E @7 r9:=5C6? 2?5 u2>:=J $6CG:46D 2 5:D2DE6Cn r2? A6C7@C>2?46 — 567:?65 2D AC6G6?E:?8 E96 562E9D @7 :?72?ED 2?5 49:=5C6? F?56C sru$’ H2E49 — 36 :>AC@G65n x7 D@[ 5@6D E92E C6BF:C6 E96 C6A=246>6?E @7 E96 4FCC6?E sru$ 49:67[ H9@ 92D 366? C6A62E65=J 4:E65 7@C 4@?E6>AE @7 4@FCE 7@C D6C:@FD 286?4J 72:=FC6Dnk^Am

kAmv:G6? E96 8@G6C?>6?E DAC2H= 😕 x==:?@:D — >@C6 F?:ED @7 8@G6C?>6?E 3J 72C E92? 2?J @E96C DE2E6 2E ?@ D>2== 4@DE — 😀 :E A@DD:3=6 E@ C6\E9:?< @FC 46?EFC:6D\@=5 2AAC@249n ~C D9@F=5 6G6CJ@?6 ;FDE E9C@H FA E96:C 92?5D 2?5 2446AE A2J:?8 >@C6 😕 AC@A6CEJ E2I6D E92? ?646DD2CJ E@ >2:?E2:? =@42= D6CG:46Dnk^Am

kAm%96 =:DE 4@F=5 8@ @?[ 3FE E96C6’D ?@ 36?67:E 😕 AFEE:?8 6G6CJ@?6 E@ D=66A]k^Am

kAm(:E9 2 =:EE=6 >@C6 E92? EH@ >@?E9D E@ 8@ F?E:= }@G] g[ 4:C4F>DE2?46D 2C6 46CE2:? E@ =:G6? FA] !@=:E:4D 2D E962E6C 😀 E96 @C56C @7 E96 52J[ 2?5 E96 3:8 7:?2=6 😀 H2:E:?8 😕 E96 H:?8D]k^Am

kAm$@[ E@@[ 2C6 DF3DE2?E:G6 5:D4FDD:@?D @7 E96 :>A@CE2?E :DDF6D @7 E96 52J] qFE E92E H:== C6>2:? 369:?5 E96 4FCE2:?[ 3642FD6 E96C6’D ?@ C62= 2AA6E:E6 E@ 962C 23@FE E96 4@>A=:42E65 3FD:?6DD @7 8@G6C?>6?E 2E 2?J =6G6=]k^Am


Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

bribery for legislation

DOJ and SEC Secure $41 Million Settlement from Brazilian Airline for FCPA Violations (Part I of II)




The Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission reached a $41 million settlement with GOL Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A. (“GOL”) to resolve criminal and civil foreign bribery charges.

GOL entered into a three-year deferred prosecution agreement (“DPA”) with DOJ in exchange for payment of a $17 million criminal penalty.  DOJ credited $1.7 million of that penalty against a $3.4 million fine that GOL agreed to pay law enforcement authorities in Brazil to resolve charges in Brazil.

In a separate resolution, GOL agreed to pay $24.5 million over two years to the SEC. The SEC’s initial settlement calculation was for $70 million, but it was reduced to $24.5 million based on GOL’s financial condition.

Between 2012 and 2013, GOL paid approximately $3.8 million in bribes to foreign officials in Brazil to secure passage of two pieces of legislation favorable to GOL.  Specifically, the legislation provided payroll tax and fuel tax reductions that benefitted GOL (as well as other Brazilian airlines).

Interestingly, the bribery scheme was carried out, with the assistance of others, by a member of GOL’s board of directors. To fund the scheme, GOL entered into sham contracts with various entities connected to Brazilian officials.  GOL made false entries into its books and records stemming from these transactions.  GOL listed the expenses as advertising and other expenses.

DOJ’s resolution did not include appointment of an independent compliance monitor.  GOL will continue to enhance its compliance program and will submit regular reports to DOJ and the SEC concerning remediation and implementation of compliance measures.

The DPA settlement includes specific certification requirements.  First, at the end of the three-year DPA, GOL’s CEO and CFO are required to certify that the company complied with all disclosure requirements under the DPA. Second, third days prior to the expiration of the three-year DPA, GOL’s CEO and CCO are required to certify that GOL has implemented a compliance and ethics program that is “reasonably designed” to prevent and detect future violations. 

Applying the Corporate Enforcement Policy factors, DOJ considered the nature, seriousness and pervasiveness of the offense; GOL received full credit for its cooperation, which included timely providing the facts obtained through GOL’s internal investigation, review of voluminous documents, interview of witnesses, and testing over two thousand transactions. 

GOL promptly remediated its compliance program, and implemented an entire anti-corruption compliance program. GOL created a separate compliance department, hired a new CCO, implemented a robust third-party risk management system, and terminated its relationship with all third parties involved in the bribery scheme.  GOL also ended its relationship with the member of its board who executed much of the bribery scheme. 

As a result, DOJ agreed to a 25 percent reduction off the bottom of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.  Because of GOL’s financial condition, however, GOL agreed to a reduced penalty of $17 million.

Source link

Continue Reading

Brazilian bribery

GOL’s Bribery Schemes Orchestrated by Board Director (Part II of II)




GOL’s bribery schemes present some interesting lessons.  Interestingly, at the center of the bribery scheme was a member of GOL’s board of directors. 

The bribery scheme was motivated by potential legislation that would benefit GOL and other Brazilian airlines.  In 2011, Brazil proposed an economic stimulus consisting, in part, with reduced payroll taxes for labor-intensive industries.  To support this reduction, GOL’s director agreed to pay $5.4 million in bribes to Brazilian politicians, including an influential leading politician, and specifically included GOL and other companies in which the GOL director had ownership interests.  As a direct result of the bribes, by the end of 2012, the legislation was enacted with a significant reduction in taxes for GOL and other businesses in which the GOL director had ownership interests.

Between October 2012 and November 2013, GOL paid approximately $1.4 million in bribes to the influential Brazilian official.  GOL paid these bribes through a third-party intermediary associated with the GOL director, as well as two companies that the Brazilian official owned and which were characterized on GOL’s books as advertising expenses.

In 2013, GOL paid $494,600 in bribes to a company associated with a different Brazilian legislator.  A close associate to the Brazilian official also received a bribe of $137,000 from GOL through a consulting company he owned. GOL listed these expenses as for other services even though no services were ever rendered.  This same close associate received $350,000 from a U.S.-based company controlled by the GOL director.

In total, GOL saved approximately $39.7 million in tax savings because the airline industry was added a year earlier to the new economic stimulus legislation.

In 2013, the GOL director met with the influential Brazilian official and other politicians to discuss lowering aviation fuel taxes in the Federal District of Brasilia.  At the time, the tax was set at 25 percent.  If reduced, GOL could use the central location as a refueling station in Brazil.  The GOL director, the Brazilian official and others agreed to a bribery scheme that resulted in the lowering of the aviation tax fuel to 12 percent.

In addition to this scheme, from June through August 2013, GOL and the GOL director paid $552,400 in bribes to a company associated with a former Brasilia official.  GOL listed the expenses in its books as a fee for other service even though no servers were ever provided. As a result, Brasilia lowered its aviation fuel tax to 12 percent. GOL saved approximately $12.24 from the reduced taxes and increased hub efficiency.

GOL’s internal controls failed to ensure compliance with controls requiring competitive vendor selection; instead, GOL was able to pay vendors through sole source contracts outside of the supply department.  GOL also paid vendors despite the fact it never received any services from the vendors. Further, the procurement process did not include effective review of documentation submitted before or after the payment of funds.  Given these weaknesses, GOL’s director was able to authorize and verify these payments with little oversight or review.

Source link

Continue Reading

Employee Reporting Systems

Focusing on an Effective Employee Reporting and Investigation System




We often hear about the “essential” elements of an effective ethics and compliance programs.  It is natural for professionals to define specific elements of an ethics and compliance framework.  This is an important way to break down a program for assessment purposes.

While analyzing the specific functions in a program, it is important to avoid a narrow review of each element. Instead, as in most issues, the analysis of each element has to incorporate a factor that captures the interdependency of various elements.  For example, the effectiveness of one element may enhance or improve the operation of another element.  A simplistic way to express this idea is — the whole is often larger than the sum of the parts.

In practical terms — an example is the interdependency of employee reporting systems, investigations and specific training programs.  Let’s start with the reporting system.  There is no question that a company’s compliance program operates more effectively when the company maintains an efficient and trusted mechanism to report allegations of misconduct (either anonymously or confidentially).  As part of this element, a company has to embed multiple avenues for employee reporting of potential misconduct, publicize the reporting avenues to increase reporting, and train managers on how to respond to employee concerns when directly raised by employees.  When all three of these sub-elements are operating effectively, the sum of the overall performance will exceed the performance of each individual sub-element.  In other words, the three distinct sub-elements are interdependent and can be leveraged to produce positive results by recognition of this important relationship. 

In reviewing each element (or sub-element), a company needs to ensure that employees know that the company encourages employee reporting, are aware of the various reporting mechanisms, and that they are receiving tailored messages to promote understanding and awareness of reporting systems. 

By themselves, these are important issues to assess.  These issues, however, cannot be viewed in isolation.  Any employee reporting system is dependent on an effective internal investigation program.  If concerns are raised and they are not promptly investigated and fairly resolved, employees will quickly lose trust in the system. 

Thus, as an important corollary to an employee reporting system, companies have to implement an effective internal investigation program.  The analytical interdependency is obvious — employees will report more concerns when they trust that their concerns will be investigated fairly, resolved promptly, and appropriate actions are taken when the investigation is completed.  This logic demonstrates how elements (and sub-elements) operate to enhance each other and improve the overall performance of the ethics and compliance program.

From a broader perspective, the link between an ethical culture and employee reporting can be easily demonstrated.  When employees report concerns, their trust in the overall system will increase when the company’s culture supports and promotes employees who report concerns.  A culture of ethics and compliance, by definition, should support and encourage employee reporting to uncover issues, conduct an investigation, and remediate any substantiated claims.  The interdependency of these issues, when coordinated and performing optimally, ensures that the overall operation of an employee reporting system is effective.

On a more granular level, companies that train mid-level managers on how to respond to employee concerns are building an effective relationship between employees and management in responding to employee concerns, referring matters for internal investigations and promoting a system that is working on all cylinders.  Recognizing the interdependency of ethics and compliance functions ensures that companies prioritize ethics and compliance issues to maximize efficiency, remediation and overall performance.

Source link

Continue Reading
Civil Rights Violations21 mins ago

The Clocks By Agatha Christie – Full Audiobook

Military Corruption22 mins ago

"Your ruler is a moron who will lose" Peter Pomerantsev, propaganda specialist

Police Bribery25 mins ago

Rage Against The Machine – Know Your Enemy (Audio)

Police Brutality31 mins ago

Protests Spread In Iran After 22-Year-Old Woman Dies In Custody of Morality Police

bribery for legislation37 mins ago

DOJ and SEC Secure $41 Million Settlement from Brazilian Airline for FCPA Violations (Part I of II)

New York40 mins ago

Black Axe: Nigeria’s Mafia Cult – BBC Africa Eye documentary

Civil Rights Violations1 hour ago

"JOE BUDDEN Is A Lying Sack Of SH*T", $1M Def Jam Deal And $2000 A Day Hustling|@Heiskeithmurrayrap

Military Corruption1 hour ago

That Awkward Moment When The Mexican Government Is Less Corrupt Than US Government

Police Bribery1 hour ago

Laurence Fox: My Son Hunter, Biden Corruption and free speech | SpectatorTV

Police Brutality2 hours ago

Prov. Police release footage of officers punching, spitting at teen suspects

Brazilian bribery2 hours ago

GOL’s Bribery Schemes Orchestrated by Board Director (Part II of II)

New York2 hours ago

Hijacking and Murder in Global Shipping’s Grim Underbelly

Civil Rights Violations2 hours ago

Checkpoint, Wednesday 7 September 2022 | Admin error behind Northland's lockdown

Military Corruption2 hours ago

Valkyria Chronicles 3 Pt23 Military Court! Exposing Corruption!

Police Bribery2 hours ago

Rep. Kevin McCarthy: What American can afford this?

Civil Rights Violations3 months ago

See No Evil (2022) ❤️Snatched on Camera❤️❤️ See No Evil July 02, 2022 FULL EPISODE

New York3 months ago

Sendomeng Remèt Lapolis Towo a- Bandi Izo 2 Gwo Zam Sou Lestomak – Yo pa Touyel – Demwazèl la Febli

Police Brutality3 months ago

#michael They Don't Care About Us😍❤

Civil Rights Violations3 months ago


Civil Rights Violations2 months ago

RAW CHASE VIDEO: Camaro vs Police After Game Stop Robbery in Houston

Military Corruption3 months ago

নারকেল ফাটানো কেলেঙ্কারি | Hasir Video | Bangla Cartoon | Pass Entertainment

Civil Rights Violations3 months ago

DON'T WATCH THIS 🙈 If You Believe the Market is Crashing! | GREY MARKET

Military Corruption3 months ago


New York3 months ago

At US/Mexico Border With Texas Sheriff (exclusive access) 🇺🇸 🇲🇽

New York3 months ago

🔴 Koudyè | EN DIRECT | 5 JUILLET 2022 – 3H

CopWatch2 months ago

Video: Someone Who Appears To Be That Gun-Waving Cop Says He’s “The Hero You Deserve”

CopWatch2 months ago

Undercover cop chases and grabs 14-year-old girl in Manhattan (VIDEO) – New York Daily News

Police Bribery3 months ago


Military Corruption3 months ago


Military Corruption3 months ago