Connect with us

North America

Ex-aide admits lied to grand jury in auditor corruption case | Ap



DOVER, Del. (AP) — A former chief of staff to Delaware State Auditor Kathy McGuiness admitted during testimony in her criminal corruption trial Thursday that he lied under oath to a grand jury that was investigating McGuiness.

Thomas Van Horn acknowledged under cross-examination by the defense that he told the grand jury in April 2021 that McGuiness had fired him a month earlier because of “disagreements” they had.

This page requires Javascript.

Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings.

kAmx? 724E[ |4vF:?6DD 2D<65 ‘2? w@C? E@ C6D:8? 3642FD6 96 925 366? 😕 2 D6IF2= C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 2 DF3@C5:?2E6 DE2776C]k^Am

kAm’2? w@C? 2=D@ 24<?@H=65865 E92E 96 ?6G6C G@=F?E66C65 :?7@C>2E:@? E@ AC@D64FE@CD 2?5 :?G6DE:82E@CD 23@FE 9:D C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 #2496= z:?8[ H9@ 2=D@ 😀 6IA64E65 E@ E6DE:7J] x?DE625[ 96 4=2:>65 E92E 96 H2D E6C>:?2E65 3642FD6 |4vF:?6DD 925 962C5 2 “A@E6?E:2= CF>@C @7 2 D6IF2= C6=2E:@?D9:A” H:E9 D@>6@?6 😕 E96 @77:46[ 2?5 E92E 96 >:89E 36 2 G:4E:> @7 “5672>2E:@?]”k^Am

kAm“(96? J@F D2:5 :E H2D 2 CF>@C[ E92E H2D 2 =:6[ 3642FD6 :E H2D 2 ECF6 DE@CJ[ H2D?’E :En” 5676?D6 2EE@C?6J $E6G6 (@@5 2D<65 ‘2? w@C?]k^Am

kAm“*6D[” C6A=:65 ‘2? w@C?[ H9@ >@>6?ED =2E6C 4@?EC25:4E65 9:>D6=7 2?5 56?:65 2?J D6IF2= C6=2E:@?D9:A]k^Am

kAm“(92E 😀 E96 567:?:E:@? @7 2 D6IF2= C6=2E:@?D9:An” 2D<65 ‘2? w@C?[ H9@ 😕 62C=:6C E6DE:>@?J 28C665 H:E9 AC@D64FE@C |2C< s6??6J E92E 9:D 7@C>6C C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 z:?8 4@F=5 36 56D4C:365 2D “C@>2?E:4]” x? 2 C64@C565 :?E6CG:6H 62C=:6C E9:D J62C[ 96 E@=5 s6??6J E92E 96 2?5 z:?8 “>256 @FE 96C6 2?5 E96C6” 3FE ?6G6C 925 2 D6IF2= C6=2E:@?D9:A]k^Am

kAm(@@5’D 4C@DD\6I2>:?2E:@? 42>6 27E6C E96 ;F586[ @FED:56 E96 ;FCJ’D AC6D6?46[ 96=5 2 =@?8 AC:G2E6 4@?G6CD2E:@? H:E9 2EE@C?6JD 367@C6 C6>:?5:?8 ‘2? w@C? E92E 96 H2D F?56C @2E9 2?5 C6BF:C65 E@ E6== E96 ECFE9]k^Am

kAm“x 2DDFC6 J@F D:C J@F 5@ ?@E H2?E E@ >6DD H:E9 E9:D ;F586 :7 J@F’C6 =J:?8[” r2CA6?E6C E@=5 ‘2? w@C? DE6C?=J]k^Am

kAm|4vF:?6DD[ 2 s6>@4C2E 6=64E65 😕 a_`g[ 😀 C6DA@?D:3=6 2D DE2E6 2F5:E@C 7@C C@@E:?8 @FE 8@G6C?>6?E 7C2F5[ H2DE6 2?5 23FD6] $96 😀 36:?8 EC:65 @? 76=@?J 4@F?ED @7 E967E 2?5 H:E?6DD :?E:>:52E:@?[ 2?5 >:D56>62?@C 492C86D @7 @77:4:2= >:D4@?5F4E[ 4@?7=:4E @7 :?E6C6DE 2?5 ?@?4@>A=:2?46 H:E9 AC@4FC6>6?E =2HD]k^Am

kAm!C@D64FE@CD 2==686[ 2>@?8 @E96C E9:?8D[ E92E |4vF:?6DD 9:C65 96C 52F89E6C 2?5 96C 36DE 7C:6?5 2D E6>A@C2CJ 6>A=@J66D 😕 a_a_[ 6G6? E9@F89 @E96C E6>A@C2CJ 6>A=@J66D 925 =67E 3642FD6 @7 E96 =24< @7 2G2:=23=6 H@C< 2>:5 E96 4@C@?2G:CFD A2?56>:4] pFE9@C:E:6D 2==686 E92E 😕 9:C:?8 96C 52F89E6C 2?5 6I6C4:D:?8 4@?EC@= @G6C E2IA2J6C >@?6J H:E9 H9:49 D96 H2D A2:5[ |4vF:?6DD 6?82865 😕 E967E @7 DE2E6 >@?6J 2?5 4@?7=:4E @7 :?E6C6DE]k^Am

kAm!C@D64FE@CD 2=D@ 92G6 2==6865 E92E |4vF:?6DD @C496DEC2E65 2 ?@\3:5 “4@>>F?:42E:@?D D6CG:46D” 4@?EC24E 7@C |J r2>A2:8? vC@FA[ 2 7:C> D96 925 FD65 2D 2 42>A2:8? 4@?DF=E2?E H96? CF??:?8 7@C =:6FE6?2?E 8@G6C?@C 😕 a_`e] %96J 2=D@ 4@?E6?5 E92E D96 56=:36C2E6=J <6AE E96 4@?EC24E A2J>6?ED F?56C Sd[___ 6249 E@ 2G@:5 92G:?8 E@ 86E E96> 2AAC@G65 3J E96 DE2E6 s:G:D:@? @7 p44@F?E:?8] %96 @H?6C @7 |J r2>A2:8? vC@FA[ r9C:DE:6 vC@DD[ DF446DD7F==J 3:5 @? 2 D64@?5 4@?EC24E 27E6C 7@C>:?8 2 ?6H 4@>A2?J 42==65 x??@G2E6 r@?DF=E:?8] vC@DD 92D E6DE:7:65 E92E |4vF:?6DD ?6G6C E@=5 96C E@ DF3>:E 2 3:== 7@C =6DD E92? Sd[___] $96 2=D@ 56D4C:365 E96 2F5:E@C’D @77:46 2D 2 “5:D2DE6C” E92E “=24<65 AC@76DD:@?2=:D>[” 2?5 E6DE:7:65 E92E D96 925 FC865 |4vF:?6DD E@ 7:C6 ‘2? w@C? :>>65:2E6=J 27E6C =62C?:?8 23@FE 9:D C6=2E:@?D9:A H:E9 z:?8]k^Am

kAmx? E96 72== @7 a_a_[ ‘2? w@C? 2AAC@24965 56AFEJ 2EE@C?6J 86?6C2= !2EC:4:2 s2G:D[ H9@ H2D 2DD:8?65 E@ E96 2F5:E@C’D @77:46[ H:E9 4@?46C?D 23@FE 9@H E96 @77:46 H2D 36:?8 CF?] s2G:D DF886DE65 E92E 96 42== uC2?< #@3:?D@?[ 2? :?G6DE:82E@C H:E9 E96 s:G:D:@? @7 r:G:= #:89ED 2?5 !F3=:4 %CFDE]k^Am

kAm’2? w@C? D2:5 96 2AAC@24965 s2G:D 27E6C |4vF:?6DD E@=5 9:> E@ FD6 9:D DE2E6 4C65:E 42C5 E@ A2J @77 E96 @G6C5F6 7:?2= 32=2?46 @? E96 |J r2>A2:8? vC@FA 4@?EC24E[ H9:49 925 6I466565 E96 :?:E:2= 3F586E 2==@42E:@? @7 Scd[___] ‘2? w@C? D2:5 |4vF:?6DD DE@@5 @G6C 9:D D9@F=56C H9:=6 96 >256 E96 !2J !2= EC2?D24E:@?[ >2<:?8 9:> “F?4@>7@CE23=6]”k^Am

kAmx? 2 }@G6>36C a_a_ 42== H:E9 #@3:?D@?[ 9@H6G6C[ ‘2? w@C? ?6G6C >6?E:@?65 E96 4C65:E 42C5 :?4:56?E] w6 :?DE625 >256 G28F6 C676C6?46D E@ 4@?EC24ED 6?E6C65 :?E@ 3J |4vF:?6DD H:E9 2 “A@=:E:42= A6CD@?” 2?5 4@>A=2:?65 E92E E96 @77:46 H2D F?56CE2<:?8 2 =@E @7 “DA64:2= C6A@CED” @? A@=:4J :DDF6D E92E H6C6 E2<:?8 2H2J 7C@> 2F5:E:?8 H@C< :E 😀 C6BF:C65 E@ 5@]k^Am

kAmw6 2=D@ 4@>A=2:?65 E@ #@3:?D@? E92E 2 C6BF6DE 7@C AC@A@D2=D E92E =65 E@ vC@DD DF446DD7F==J 3:55:?8 @? E96 4@?EC24E 2H2C565 E@ x??@G2E6 H2D 5C2H? FA 3J 2 J@F?8 DE2776C[ C2E96C E92? 2 G6E6C2? DE2776C H9@ ?@C>2==J 92?5=65 DF49 5FE:6D] ‘2? w@C? E6DE:7:65 %9FCD52J E92E 96 H2D AC6DDFC65 3J |4vF:?6DD’ 6I64FE:G6 2DD:DE2?E E@ D4@C6 vC@DD’ 3:5 9:896C E92? 2?@E96C 7:C>’D 4@>A6E:?8 3:5[ 3FE 96 ?6G6C >6?E:@?65 E92E 😕 9:D 42== E@ #@3:?D@?]k^Am

kAm’2? w@C? 2=D@ E6DE:7:65 E92E 96 ?6G6C :?E6CG:6H65 |4vF:?6DD’ 52F89E6C[ t=:K236E9[ 7@C E96 A2CE\E:>6 ;@3 D96 3682? 😕 |2J a_a_[ 4@?EC25:4E:?8 E96 52F89E6C’D E6DE:>@?J 7C@> (65?6D52J]k^Am

kAm%6DE:>@?J C6DF>6D uC:52J]k^Am

Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

North America

Improving accountability laws and capacity




Dr. Ikramul Haq and Abdul Rauf Shakoori

Dr. Ikramul Haq, Abdul Rauf Shakoori

The world ranking by Transparency International placed Pakistan at number 140 in the latest Corruption Perception Index (CPI) 2021. This confirms that our weak preventive mechanisms for controlling corruption and countering white collar crimes need massive improvements. The Transparency International, in its various reports, has highlighted many difficulties/impediments faced by Pakistani citizens while interacting with various state institutions. The July 2021 report of Asia Pacific Group (APG) also pinpoints Pakistan’s weaknesses in dealing with corruption and white collar crimes. The report concludes that inefficient bureaucracy and high level of corruption pose a significant barrier to compliance and business growth in Pakistan.

– Advertisement –

Even after 75 years of independence we have failed to adequately address the challenges posed by white collar crimes, corruption and money laundering etc. Pakistan’s legislative history offers credible clues when laws were promulgated and abused for personal and political gains. The first Constituent Assembly passed the ‘Public and Representative Offices (Disqualification) Act of 1949 (PRODA) with retrospective effect from 15th August 1947—day one of the sovereign state. Then came the Elective Bodies (Disqualification) Order (EBDO) in 1959 by martial law regime of General Muhammad Ayub Khan.

The PRODA was aimed at debarring dissident voices from public life on charges of misconduct (sic) up to 15 years. The EBDO disqualified an entire generation of politicians through coercion and/or ‘voluntary retirement’—the pretext? Cleansing the “country’s body politic from all sorts of corruption”.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto also ventured into accountability through the Holders of Representative Offices (Prevention of Misconduct) Act, 1976 and Parliament and Provincial Assemblies (Disqualification from Membership) Act, 1976 and the Parliament and Provincial Assemblies (Disqualification for Membership) Order, 1977.

– Advertisement –

General Muhammad Ziaul Haq promulgated two draconian accountability laws, namely, Holders of Representative Offices (Punishment for Misconduct) Order, 1977 and Parliament and Provincial Assemblies (Disqualification for Membership) Order, 1977. Later during his 11-year-old rule through many presidential orders, in the name of eliminating corruption, he systematically promoted it by giving unprecedented favours to his supporters, writing off their loans, and issuing grants to members of national and provincial assemblies.

While rewarding his allies through lucrative posts and waiving outstanding loans, General Pervez Musharraf introduced the National Accountability Ordinance 1999 (NAB Ordinance) to punish political opponents. It was made applicable from January 1, 1985. This was in violation of the fundamental right guaranteed in Article 12(1) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan [“the Constitution”], which reads as under:

Protection against retrospective punishment

  1. (1) No law shall authorize the punishment of a person—
  • for an act or omission that was not punishable by law at the time of the act or omission; or
  • for an offence by a penalty greater than, or of a kind different from, the penalty prescribed by law for that offence at the time the offence was committed”.

NAB Ordinance resulted in silencing many dissenting voices and offices of National Accountability Bureau (NAB) were used to arrest people on flimsy grounds detaining them for extended periods and subjecting them to mental and physical torture to extract confessions or forced into plea bargains. The former chief justice of Pakistan, Jawad S. Khawaja, described this practice as institutionalized corruption. The APG’s Mutual Evaluation Report observed that NAB’s performance resulted in only “one person being convicted for money laundering related cases from 2013-2018”.

Undeniably, from its very inception NAB has been controversial—perceived as a tool for oppression and victimization of political opponents by those in power proving to be true with passage of time and can be verified from last 20 years track record as also from many judgements of superior courts. The politically-motivated and discriminatory approach of NAB has shaken people’s faith regarding its credibility and impartiality. Unfortunately, accountability enactments so far, including NAB Ordinance, have been employed as tools to influence loyalties, fracturing and rupturing political parties.

Many of NAB’s accountability cases amount to squashing of fundamental rights, unlawfully curtailing freedom in utter disregard for human dignity, arresting accused on random application and without any trial process keeping them behind bars in the name of so-called investigation. Many innocent persons were incarcerated for months and years without being provided sufficient cause. Due to NAB authorities’ incompetency and lack of professionalism a number of investigations remained inconclusive for years with cases pending in courts. Even where these were concluded conviction rate was terribly low. Instead of serving the noble cause of eradicating corruption, this tool for arm-twisting politicians has caused irreparable loss to the country and society in multiple ways. The flawed mechanism of NAB compelled politicians and government functionaries to restrain from necessary actions/decisions for smooth functioning of the state and its organs.

Another impediment to eradicating white collar crimes is our judicial system. As per the Global Competitive Report (GCR) 2020, two out of five Pakistanis believe that our judicial system is corrupt and makes favourable decisions for those accused of irregular payments. The report highlights that the corporate sector has no faith in the judiciary. It says that Pakistan’s judiciary is known for inefficiency, poor case management, unnecessary delays, and nepotism and is subject to undue influence from the power corridor of wealthy, religious and political figures.

In the last four years our ranking on CPI changed from 117 to 140 and as we are also in the FATF programme to address money laundering and terrorist financing framework, we have to urgently combat corruption, white collar crimes, and illicit proceeds meant to corrode the foundations of our society.

Till today, selective accountability has not only promoted corruption, but has also drained our economy. For improving our global image, the way forward is to reform our institutions, insist on uniform application of laws and implement robust, effective controls over law enforcement and judiciary to protect the citizens’ rights without any discrimination.

The real challenge is how can we handle the malaise of corruption? Should we continue amending the NAB Ordinance, as we are doing since its promulgation? Better option is to improve our governance and elevate our institutions at par with international standards so that we should not have another parallel system for arm-twisting of opponents.

Any exercise to update accountability laws with the intent to bring positive changes will not serve any purpose unless reforms in all institutions—civil and military—are undertaken. The continuous involvement of powerful institutions of army and judiciary in our political and administrative matters is causing damage to the entire system.

Role of our higher judiciary is under question since last six years. Their controversial judgements are on one hand impacting our global image and on the other, hampering our economic growth. Despite being ranked at number 130 by the World Justice Project Report, we have not witnessed any radical change to improve. In most of the cases, it appears that the judgements are beyond assigned powers. Since the accountability process of judiciary is weak, it hardly provides effective system of check and balances. In presence of these issues amending NAB Ordinance alone will be insufficient. Rather, it will open more avenues for abuse and misuse.

The incumbent government of the Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM) has amended the NAB Ordinance trying to roll back retrospective application. However, the new amended Act of 2022 is still faulty. Definition of benamidar (name-lender) needs clarity as it can be misused. Present procedure for appointment of National Accountability judges through respective high courts must be reviewed placing it under the apex court. Similarly, offences of corruption and corrupt practices, defined under section 9 of the NAB Ordinance, need further explanation in the light of best international practices—mere allegation of lifestyle disproportionate to known sources of income does not make any person guilty unless incontrovertible evidence is available and presented to a competent judicial authority before arresting and trying an accused.

The working of our institutions cannot be improved unless a proper mechanism for their accountability is not introduced. The concept of self-accountability for judges in the name of independent of judiciary is tarnishing the image of our judicial system. It is promoting both selective justice and violating the norms set by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights issued by United Nations that specifically states: “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile”. Moreover, the recent decisions of higher courts are in open violation of Article 10A of the Constitution of Pakistan, which extends right of fair trial to every citizen and reads: “For the determination of his civil rights and obligations or in any criminal charge against him a person shall be entitled to a fair trial and due process”.

In the end, we must understand that Pakistan as a country is alleged to have an apex court and higher judiciary indulging in excessive and misplaced judicial activism in contradiction of Article 175(2) of the Constitution. This alleged undesirable practice has undermined our image as a nation in the international community and impacted our social, political and economic stature. Since misplaced judicial activism motivated by political and/or personal preference leads to deviation by courts from their assigned jurisdiction, their decisions set undesirable precedents for lower courts. Consequently, the people have to pay enormous price on political and economic fronts. Therefore, it is mandatory that before amending accountability statutes, our lawmakers should introduce comprehensive laws for across the board accountability—their own, judges and all officials in civil and military bureaucracy. Unless it is done, the dream of making Pakistan corruption-free will remain unrealized.


Dr. Ikramul Haq, Advocate Supreme Court, specialises in constitutional, corporate, media, ML/CFT related laws, IT, intellectual property, arbitration and international tax laws. He is country editor and correspondent of International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD) and member of International Fiscal Association (IFA). He is Visiting Faculty at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS) and member Advisory Board and Visiting Senior Fellow of Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE).

Abdul Rauf Shakoori, Advocate High Court, is a subject-matter expert on AML-CFT, Compliance, Cyber Crime and Risk Management. He has been providing AML-CFT advisory and training services to financial institutions (banks, DNFBPs, Investment companies, Money Service Businesses, insurance companies and securities), government institutions including law enforcement agencies located in North America (USA & CANADA), Middle East and Pakistan. His areas of expertise include legal, strategic planning, cross border transactions including but not limited to joint ventures (JVs), mergers & acquisitions (M&A), takeovers, privatizations, overseas expansions, USA Patriot Act, Banking Secrecy Act, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC).


The recent publication, coauthored by these writers with Huzaima Bukhari, is:

Pakistan Tackling FATF: Challenges & Solutions  and


Source link

Continue Reading

North America

Former Gansevoort man admits to insurance fraud | Crime and Courts




ALBANY — A former Gansevoort man has pleaded guilty in federal court to engaging in a money laundering conspiracy to conceal proceeds from a multi-state unemployment insurance fraud scheme.

Christopher L. Vandermark, 57, admitted in U.S. District Court in Albany on Tuesday that he had been corresponding through online text messages for over a year with a person who represented herself to be a woman living in North Carolina. The woman told Vandermark to open accounts at multiple financial institutions and directed him to provide her with routing information for his existing accounts, according to a news release.

From June 2020 through early April 2021, Vandermark’s accounts received transfers of more than $88,000 in fraudulently obtained unemployment insurance benefits from six states.

Vandermark purchased of hundreds of gift cards from local retailers using the money, photographed the identifying numbers on the cards and sent them to the woman. Then, the numbers could be used to sell the gift cards online to conceal the original source of the funds, authorities said.

People are also reading…

Vandermark admitted to continuing these activities even after receiving multiple warnings from financial institutions that he was participating in a fraudulent scheme. On April 15, 2021, a federal law enforcement agent and a state investigator interviewed Vandermark at his residence regarding approximately $37,000 in fraudulently obtained unemployment insurance benefits transferred to his account at a local bank. He had denied holding the account and receiving the funds. Those statements were determined to be false.

Afterward, authorities said Vandermark opened an account with a different institution and received another $13,734 in benefits from three states, which were deposited into two accounts and used to purchase more gift cards.

He has agreed to pay restitution to the affected states.

Vandermark could face up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $500,000 when sentenced on Oct. 27.

The case was investigated by the Department of Homeland Security-Office of the Inspector General, with assistance from the Social Security Administration Office of the Inspector General and the Office of the New York State Comptroller. It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney John Chisholm.

Source link

Continue Reading

North America

2 convicted in $1.4B fraud scheme preying on rural hospitals, addiction patients – FierceHealthcare




Continue Reading
World8 months ago

Albanian Daily News

North America9 months ago

Administration’s Anti-Corruption Efforts Likely to Yield Greater FCPA Enforcement in Latin America and Beyond | Womble Bond Dickinson

Military Corruption6 months ago

Judy Byington intel Restored Republic via a GCR update 9 January 2022 US News Today

North America8 months ago

Heidi Planck missing update – Jason Sugarman ‘probed over a $43M fraud’ as Reddit & Webslueth users seek LinkedIn clues

World6 months ago

Prison governor arrested over bribery and drugs allegations at Wormwood Scrubs

Military Corruption6 months ago

Nicholas Veniamin with Michelle Fielding: TRUMP WIN and ROLL OUT, QUANTUM SYSTEM, MILITARY!

North America9 months ago

Brian Laundrie timeline – What Gabby’s fiancé did as throttled body lay outside from camping with sister to hitchhiking

World9 months ago

Behind the blue line: Investigating Abdullah Shah

General9 months ago

Who Is Curtis Sliwa? A Look at the GOP Mayoral Candidate’s Wild Ride in New York

North America9 months ago

Former Boeing 737 MAX Chief Technical Pilot Indicted for Fraud | USAO-NDTX

North America9 months ago

Brian Laundrie update: Where does the search stand now?

General9 months ago

U.S. Arrests Alex Saab, Deal Maker for Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela

Police Bribery6 months ago


North America9 months ago

Gabby Petito autopsy update – John Walsh ID Special Report ‘claims Brian Laundrie is in Mexico’ as fiance still missing

North America9 months ago

Founder of Russian Bank Pleads Guilty to Tax Fraud | OPA