Accused of accepting bribes from a
former NYPD officer, two current New York Police Department cops were recently
indicted on federal conspiracy and bribery charges. The retired officer was
also charged in the conspiracy.
Between May 2020 and May 2021, NYPD
Officer Michael Perri, who operated a tow truck and vehicle repair business,
allegedly paid thousands of dollars in bribe payments to NYPD Officers James
Davneiro and Giancarlo Osma in exchange for responding to car accidents and
steering the damaged vehicles to Perri’s business. Although Davniero and Osma
were legally required to use the NYPD’s Directed Accident Response Program to
identify an appropriate licensed tow trucking and automobile repair business to
respond to the scene, they repeatedly called Perri’s business instead for cash
Perri retired from the NYPD in June
2020, but the scheme continued until May 2021, according to the indictment.
On Friday, Davneiro, Osma, and
Perri were arrested on federal charges of conspiracy to violate the travel act
and using interstate facilities to commit bribery. Davniero and Osma have both
been suspended without
“As alleged in the indictment,
these defendants disgraced their badges and betrayed the public trust and their
oaths as police officers by lining their pockets with cash bribes,” stated
Acting U. S. Attorney Jacquelyn Kasulis in a recent press
release. “We will continue to root out and prosecute corruption by
those who are sworn to enforce and uphold the law.”
“Accepting bribes as a law
enforcement officer in lieu of following legal procedure is against the law and
won’t be tolerated. Those charged today aren’t representative of the tens of
thousands of men and women who serve the NYPD with honor day in and day out
and, as such, will be held accountable for their alleged crime,” said FBI
Assistant Director-in-Charge Michael Driscoll.
“The NYPD cleans its own house.
Corruption is a crime and a violation of a police officer’s sworn oath. This
investigation is the third phase of an ongoing case where our Internal Affairs
Bureau investigators left no stone unturned,” asserted NYPD Commissioner Dermot
If convicted, the defendants face
up to five years in prison.
If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.
$78 Million SEC Resolution, But No DOJ Prosecution For Tenaris Despite Recidivism – White Collar Crime, Anti-Corruption & Fraud
44 mins ago
June 25, 2022
24 June 2022
Morrison & Foerster LLP
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.
James Koukios spoke to Anti-Corruption Report about
Luxembourg-based steel pipe manufacturer Tenaris agreeing to pay
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) more than $78 million
to resolve charges related to its Brazilian subsidiary paying
bribes to a Brazilian government official between 2008 and 2013,
though the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has indicated that it
does not intend to pursue its own charges.
The DOJ declining to prosecute is supported by the inclusion of
a civil penalty in the SEC order, but DOJ did not send the company
a Corporate Enforcement Policy (CEP) declination letter. “The
lack of a CEP declination letter suggests that DOJ declined due to
a lack of evidence or the existence of a compelling defense, as
opposed to a policy-based declination,” James said.
He added: “Although the SEC stated that Tenaris had failed
to implement adequate internal accounting controls in the wake of
the 2011 resolution, a good portion of the underlying conduct took
place before the original resolution was reached and appears to
have stopped in or around 2013. That gave Tenaris many years to
enhance its compliance program and remediate issues before the
Because of the generality of this update, the information
provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should
not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular
A recent federal government indictment of a former executive for national hospital chain Health Management Associates (HMA) provides yet another example of the fact that a cover-up can lead to consequences as severe as the crime itself.
Bigoted Attacks Are Injecting Fear Into Pride Month, But We Won’t Back Down
2 hours ago
June 25, 2022
This year the tide of anti-trans and anti-queer hate has surged to new heights. More than 300 anti-trans or anti-LGBTQ laws have been introduced in 2022 alone — often by the same Republican lawmakers introducing anti-Black and anti-abortion bills. Over 25 have passed, most of them targeting trans teens and children. Republican politicians, as well as right-wing pundits and influencers, have encouraged their followers to murder or otherwise harm trans people, drag queens, queer people and parents who support trans children.
The Interconnected Targets of White Christian Supremacy
White Christian supremacists tend to save most of their bullets for those who are Black, Indigenous, immigrants, Latinx, Jewish, Muslim, Asian, Arab, or acting in solidarity with one or more of those groups. That includes a lot of LGBTQ+ people, of course. But it also includes a lot of straight cis people. While Buffalo shooter Payton Gendron saw trans advocacy organizations as part of a Jewish plot to reduce white birth rates, the people he actually chose to murder were Black folks shopping for groceries. Still, anti-LGBTQ+ violence has always formed a part of the larger white Christian supremacist toolkit. White Christian supremacy is a gendered ideology and movement that hinges on patriarchy.
Some reasons for anti-transness in white Christian supremacist ideology are theological. Imara Jones explains some of them in her series exploring the anti-trans hate machine:
We have to understand that … they believe that the division of the world into men and women, each in their biblical roles, is the only way that God will return. And their faith is so structured around these patriarchal ideas, that they’re convinced that trans people are the ultimate threat to God Himself, to His divine order.
Other aspects are eugenic, based in the idea that it is desirable and possible to create a world with more or only people who are “fit” (read: non-disabled, healthy, white, Protestant, cis, straight, U.S. citizen, conservative) and fewer or none of everyone else. The Buffalo shooter was far from the first to weave together anti-LGBTQ hatred and antisemitism to speculate that trans identity, gender nonconformity and same-sex relationships result from a Jewish plot to reduce birth rates among white Christians. In their eyes, white, Christian, non-disabled children raised by white, cis, straight, non-disabled, Christian adults and protected from other influences will and should become white, cis, straight, non-disabled, Christian adults who will have and raise more white, Christian, non-disabled children and carry out the white Christian supremacist agenda. In white trans and queer people from Christian backgrounds, they see either misguided victims who can still be rescued and rehabilitated into cisgender and heterosexual normativity through Christianity, or lost causes who must not be permitted to influence others. And in trans and queer folks who are also Black, Indigenous, or other people of color, and in those who are also Jewish, disabled or Muslim, they don’t see people at all. Their tactics are designed to fall most heavily on people in these groups, and they do. Anti-trans laws — by design — tend to harm Black trans folks the most. Of the at least 15 trans people murdered so far in the U.S. in 2022, at least 12 were Black, Latina or Asian.
Police Won’t Save (Most of) Us
On June 11, a worker in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, called in a tip that a “little army” of men with shields were entering a U-Haul van. Police arrested 31 white nationalists, equipped with riot gear and a smoke grenade, who had traveled from 11 states to attack LGBTQ+ people at a Pride gathering. Various media outlets have praised the police for arresting these Patriot Front members — the same group that famously descended on Charlottesville in 2017. At first glance, some might imagine that in this instance the police are trustworthy opponents of white supremacy acting in allyship with LGBTQ people, but that view would be misguided.
Let’s look a little closer at the actors involved.
Sheriff Bob Norris of Kootenai County, along with Police Chief Lee White, took credit for these arrests, and framed them as riot prevention. In Idaho, like most of the country, police favor white people over Black and Indigenous people. According to the ACLU, in Idaho overall, police are 3.9 times more likely to arrest a Black person for cannabis possession than a white person. That’s bad enough. In Kootenai County, though, the disparity soars even higher — sheriffs’ deputies are 6.2 times more likely to arrest a Black person than a white person for cannabis possession. While it’s trickier to find county-level statistics regarding Indigenous people, Idaho law enforcement also targets these communities. Suquamish tribe descendant Jeanetta Riley is one of the Indigenous people Idaho police have killed. A federal study looking at racial disparities in how several states, including Idaho, handle arrests of teens and children found that police were more likely to refer Indigenous people to authorities (rather than release them to their family with a warning) than any other racial group.
As for Norris specifically, a few months ago he attended a Republican fundraiser featuring white nationalist speakers and guests, where a white nationalist speaker — Dave Reilly — thanked him for keeping them safe. A white supremacist publication wrote an article celebrating Norris’s election as sheriff because of his stance against enforcing mask mandates. Previously, he worked as a deputy in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. He reportedly donated $600 to the campaign of Paul Tanaka, an undersheriff who was himself linked to white supremacists, implicated in giving out promotions based on who donated to his campaign, and convicted of conspiracy and obstruction of justice for interfering in an FBI investigation into corruption and widespread violence from deputies against people in the jail he helped run.
I don’t know what Bob Norris believes. But regardless of his beliefs, he works for a system that violently enforces white supremacy. It’s not surprising that white supremacists saw the police as their friend, and are lashing out against them now for arresting members of the Patriot Front. After all, whether in Ohio or Russia, New York or Turkey, again and again it has been the police who physically attack trans and queer people — especially Black and Indigenous people, and other trans and queer people of color who take to the streets.
As for the Pride event in Coeur d’Alene? It was the biggest yet, as Jessica Mahuron told the Spokesman, “full of love and connection.” But numerous anti-LGBTQ groups organized counter-events and had a presence at the event itself, including some who walked through the event carrying guns or anti-LGBTQ signs. And Patriot Front members were not exactly neutralized — they filmed themselves handing out racist pamphlets after their arrest and ominously promised they would return.
Between the ongoing threat of COVID-19 and of police, vigilante, and other hate violence, it has not been easy for people or organizations to decide on their approach to Pride this June. Some groups have canceled events in light of death threats or increasing COVID rates. Others have opted for coordinating with law enforcement, hiring private security firms and requesting increased police presence. But of course, those have never been the only options — and for many trans and queer people, a police presence spells more danger, not safety.
Keeping Ourselves and Each Other Safe
For many decades, trans and queer people have developed and practiced ways to keep each other safe without relying on the police. We have also defined safety holistically. When we talk about making Pride events safe, that includes safety from tear gas and from overdose, safety from shooters and from illness. And we keepteaching each other our safety tips.
Vision Change Win, a Black-led QTPOC social change organization, released a comprehensive Community Safety Toolkit, written largely by Ejeris Dixon but reflecting oral traditions passed down for decades and covering topics as broad as deescalating conflict, treating tear gas, recruiting and training a security team and reducing COVID risk. All event planners should familiarize themselves with these tools.
Formations like Interrupting Criminalization and Community Resource Hub have been pointing out and fighting for the types of strategies that are proven to actually stop violence. For example, violence interrupter programs, more investment in community organizations, improvements to the physical environment such as better lighting, housing and green spaces, and decriminalization itself have been shown to actually reduce violence.
Meanwhile a wide range of folks have been rolling out trainings on self-defense, community defense, upstander intervention (tactics people can use to stop violence when they see it), harm reduction, first aid, legal rights with police and how to respond when menaced by a shooter. For example, according to Rolling Stone, drag queens have continued reading to kids in libraries targeted by the Proud Boys — but they are working with the Anti-Violence Project to get trained and put protocols in place in case of further attacks.
Those holding digital events often have their ownsafetyprotocols in place to deal with Zoom bombers, infiltrators and others who would do harm.
This Pride, we have to remember that when we show up in numbers, white Christian supremacists are likely to back down. We have to remember that they have been trying to rid the world of our magnificence for centuries, and they have always failed. As long as we keep loving and protecting each other, they will always fail.
Gun Violence: What’s Really Behind the “Right to Keep and Bear?”
3 hours ago
June 25, 2022
If the people who suffer from gun violence were the same as the people who profit from gun violence, gun control measures would be strong and strongly enforced. Discussions about the 2nd Amendment would center on the “well regulated militia” concept rather than the “right to keep and bear” language.
The reality is that our current stance on the 2nd Amendment has nothing to do with the views of the Founding Fathers and everything to do with the desire to keep the middle and lower classes fighting and killing each other, while leaving a small wealthy elite in control.
It may seem an odd idea that allowing the nation to be awash in 400 million guns is “keeping control.” But we are told that 100 million of our population own the vast majority of those 400 million guns. The average person doesn’t own or want to carry around a gun. But with proper training, the average person can be taught to exist in a state of apprehension that gun violence is always just around the next corner, always a risk when visiting 7-11 or your favorite after-work bar.
The inevitability of gun violence is an argument for allowing police to be armed and to shoot first and ask questions later (if their targets survive). The corporate “liberal media” produces a constant flood of stories about cities, like Chicago, being wracked with constant gun violence, while having grown silent about the equal constant corruption and racism practiced by Chicago police.
A University of Chicago study, referenced recently in the New York Times points out a few salient points. Most of the shootings in the city happen in just 4% of the city’s blocks: This isolates most Chicagoans, and almost all white Chicagoans, from exposure to gun violence and from the direct consequences of gun violence. For most people, even in a “blood drenched” city like Chicago, gun violence is what they see on TV, replayed over and over – not what really happens.
Too few people remember the summer of 1968 and press coverage of the police riots promoted by Mayor Richard Dailey. Back then, newspapers and radio and TV stations were locally owned. And they provided different viewpoints on the police riots and corruption. They covered investigations and prosecutions of police corruption
One result of media “consolidation,” putting control of both broadcast and print media into the hands of a handful of Wall Street corporations is that reporting of what once were controversial topics has, for most consumers, been replaced with the traditional Republican conservatism of the three “traditional” TV networks and the ultra-corporatist rightwing polemics of Fox News, and the Russian controlled NewsMax, ONAN and Breitbart.
TV and film westerns trained us to believe that bank robberies were an everyday occurrence in the Old West. Statistics tell us that the reality is that bank robberies were incredibly rare in the Old West. Most people cling to the fictitious movie images. And equally misleading “news” coverage of modern shootings drives viewership, and sells lucrative advertising.
Corporate news-as-entertainment is like westerns. Movies show us bank robbers being tracked down by righteous sheriffs or vigilantes. But they don’t show us the banks foreclosing on struggling farmers, or railroad barons bribing congressmen for grants of vast swaths of land to sell to those farmers so they could struggle until foreclosure, when the land would be resold to another eager farmer.
The news-as-entertainment shows us impoverished Black children turning to violent crime. But doesn’t show us the same children watching their siblings bitten by rats and roaches in apartments where landlords collect rent without ever doing maintenance or pest control, despite housing laws. The law violations of the wealthy landlords are much more damaging to more people in any neighborhood than a street robbery. But they are “less newsworthy,” and so get little or no coverage.
Scroll to Continue
Once upon a time, we were told that they were “our” airwaves, owned by the people, and only licensable by broadcasters willing to provide public service, like fair access to viewpoints, in exchange for permission to profit from using the public property. Now, as with so much else, the public service component has been jettisoned with profit the only remaining goal of using the people’s property. And the best, most profitable use is to continue driving people’s fear.
For this election cycle, one Republican candidate is offering “hunting licenses” in exchange for donations. Missouri senate candidate Eric Greitens, who quit his job as governor after his wife and child-beating behavior was publicized, now offers “no limit” licenses to shoot “RINOs” – humans who disagree with Greiten’s political views.
This is not Squid Game or Hunger Game, or some other fiction fantasy. This is a wealthy businessman, surrounded by comprehensive security, telling his supporters that it is OK to murder people if you disagree with their politics.
Colt, Remington, Smith & Wesson, Winchester and all the traditional American gunmakers are no longer American companies. Each is now the subsidiary of a multinational corporation or hedge fund. They merchandise tools for killing, while knowing that the hedge fund owners and corporate bosses are safe from the weapons they sell to the poor.
On June 23, 2022, the John Roberts Court ruled that every person has the right to carry concealed weapons. This decision overrules a law passed by a radical leftist New York legislature in 1913. This decision follows the Roberts Court holding, last week, that the 4th Amendment protection against warrantless search and seizure no longer applies to people living in the United States, and that no one has any recourse against whatever force a police officer chooses to use while conducting a warrantless search and seizure.
What this means is that, as George Bush said, the Constitution is “just a bunch of words on some god damn old paper.” The Constitution may say that you are protected by the 4th Amendment. But if the government has some special need, it can do away with those rights. And no person has any recourse against police misconduct.
Essentially, this tells the poor and the powerless that the government is their enemy, and that if they want to protect their own lives or those of their family and friends, they have to make the effort on their own. This is the Supreme Court actively encouraging more gun violence among the poor and powerless.
The June 24 decision that women have no Constitutional right to control their own reproductive functions (despite the 9th Amendment) is part of the same logic. Large majorities of Americans, of all political parties, support women’s rights. But six Republican “justices” of the Supreme Court say that their Catholic theology trumps such rights.
To a court that pretends to favor religious freedom, the reproductive rights of women who do not share Catholic misogynist beliefs is simply irrelevant. The goal isn’t about people’s sex lives or rebuilding an already too large population. Rather the goal is to further convince people that they are not in control of their own lives – the state is.
Control can be by taking rights away from people, like telling women they have to carry rape or incest babies to term and for lifetimes, or by granting new rights, like telling every gang banger, mental patient and frustrated warehouse or store employee that they have the Constitutional right to express their anger with a gun. It is specifically not about freedom but about exerting further control over the middle and lower ranks of the population.