Connect with us


WPP SEC FCPA Enforcement Action: Lessons Learned (Part III of III)



The SEC’s FCPA enforcement action against WPP presents a number of important lessons learned, ranging from third-party risk management, properly responding to employee complaints and red flags, and failure to integrate acquisition targets into existing compliance programs. 

At bottom, WPP and its subsidiaries lacked any culture of compliance.  While it is easy to cite all the deficiencies in the WPP subsidiaries, such a focus misses one important point – the importance of ethics and compliance is set by, promoted and depends on the tone and commitment from the parent organization.  WPP lacked any real commitment and its tone permeated every aspect of its business operations.

Failure to Conduct Due Diligence:  WPP’s subsidiaries failed to conduct appropriate due diligence for any of the third-parties involved in the various bribery schemes. Had due diligence been conducted, WPP would have learned about risk relationships between the local CEOs and relevant government officials. Of course, there is no guarantee that the due diligence results would have resulted in WPP prevent such high-risk relationships or insisted on robust risk mitigation steps.

Defective Responses to Employee Concerns: The SEC statement of facts is replete with instances where anonymous employee concerns were raised and not taken seriously.  This reflected a failure on WPP’s part to respond properly to these concerns.  As described by the SEC, some of the concerns described the bribery scheme in detail.  Yet, WPP failed to appreciate these employee reports and failed to respond by launching appropriate investigations, conducting additional due diligence or analyzing financial data.

Improper Use of Outside Accounting Firm to Investigate Bribery Concerns: On one occasion in India, WPP retained a global accounting firm.  The investigation launched by the accounting firm was improperly scoped and executed.  The accounting firm failed to investigate the central allegation – whether the subsidiary was paying bribes to government officials.  Instead, the accounting firm conducted a broad brushed investigation, failed to review email messages and conduct a focused financial inquiry.  The oversight and execution of the investigation was deficient.

Failure to Uncover Local Employee Forgery and Falsification of Documentation: The SEC noted that on occasion WPP employees falsified or forged invoices and other documents relating to non-existent or inflated services allegedly provided by outside vendors.  This failure to confirm appropriate documentation and services provided by a vendor underscores the risk that insiders can manipulate accounting controls by suppling false documentation. To remedy such problems, companies have to adhere to relevant accounting controls and ensure the absence of segregation of duty conflicts.  WPP’s local operations lacked such basic controls.

Defective Internal Accounting Controls: To the extent that WPP maintained a proper set of internal accounting controls, it is not clear that these controls were even applied to acquisition targets, and even if extended, the controls were ignored. WPP’s internal accounting controls were defective on their face, and it is hard to imagine how WPP’s auditor never tested nor identified the weaknesses in its controls, particularly given WPP’s aggressive growth strategy.  WPP’s rampant misconduct among its local subsidiaries demonstrates the important of design of internal controls that can be implemented across the organization and testing of the controls in local markets.l

Absence of Acquisition Integration Planning: WPP’s blatant misconduct underscores the importance of integration planning and execution of acquisition targets. WPP adopted an aggressive acquisition strategy to grow its business in emerging markets.  Given the high-risk nature of its acquisition strategy, WPP should have adopted a robust due diligence pre-acquisition program and detailed acquisition integration and audits.  Such integration planning should have included prompt training, adoption of compliance program policies and procedures and conduct of an FCPA audit.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

World8 months ago

Albanian Daily News

North America8 months ago

Administration’s Anti-Corruption Efforts Likely to Yield Greater FCPA Enforcement in Latin America and Beyond | Womble Bond Dickinson

Military Corruption6 months ago

Judy Byington intel Restored Republic via a GCR update 9 January 2022 US News Today

North America8 months ago

Heidi Planck missing update – Jason Sugarman ‘probed over a $43M fraud’ as Reddit & Webslueth users seek LinkedIn clues

Military Corruption6 months ago

Nicholas Veniamin with Michelle Fielding: TRUMP WIN and ROLL OUT, QUANTUM SYSTEM, MILITARY!

World6 months ago

Prison governor arrested over bribery and drugs allegations at Wormwood Scrubs

North America8 months ago

Brian Laundrie timeline – What Gabby’s fiancé did as throttled body lay outside from camping with sister to hitchhiking

World9 months ago

Behind the blue line: Investigating Abdullah Shah

General9 months ago

Who Is Curtis Sliwa? A Look at the GOP Mayoral Candidate’s Wild Ride in New York

North America8 months ago

Former Boeing 737 MAX Chief Technical Pilot Indicted for Fraud | USAO-NDTX

North America9 months ago

Brian Laundrie update: Where does the search stand now?

Police Bribery5 months ago


General8 months ago

U.S. Arrests Alex Saab, Deal Maker for Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela

North America8 months ago

Gabby Petito autopsy update – John Walsh ID Special Report ‘claims Brian Laundrie is in Mexico’ as fiance still missing

North America8 months ago

Founder of Russian Bank Pleads Guilty to Tax Fraud | OPA